Posts

A Tale of Two Women -- Who Exercised Their Professional Independence

Image
May 2018, Vancouver BC Jody Wilson-Raybould’s story has triggered memories of professional trauma for me, like watching Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony last fall triggered memories of sexual trauma for many women. The way Wilson-Raybould has been treated represents a pattern of pressure applied to women who dare assert their professional independence, voice, and decision-making power. Most cases just aren’t made public. Wilson-Raybould and I were each welcomed to our professional appointments (as Attorney General of Canada and as Montalbano Professor of Leadership Studies: Gender and Diversity at UBC’s Sauder School of Business , respectively) with publicity and fanfare that celebrated diversity and the goodness of the White men who put us there. But when those men realized they couldn’t control how we carried out our professional duties, everything came crashing down. Each of us got in trouble for exercising our right to make independent judgments in our professional capaci

Henry Reichman on Dealing with Controversial Speakers on Campus

Image
I attended the Harry Crowe Foundation ’s conference on Free Speech on Campus in Toronto last month. There was a great line-up of speakers who shared data, history, legal arguments, and general principles on academic freedom and free speech at universities.  A consensus was that academic freedom, freedom of expression, and social justice reinforce one another. James Turk from the Centre for Free Expression at Ryerson University and former Executive Director of CAUT said, “Social justice is not possible without freedom of expression, and genuine freedom of expression is not possible without social justice.” Momin Rahman from Trent University concluded, “Equity and academic freedom are mutually reinforcing.” Samir Gandesha , Director of the Institute for the Humanities at Simon Fraser University, pointed out that “Insisting on too strong a distinction between free speech and academic freedom might open up the door for institutions to try to regulate who can and who cannot speak.” Here

Kavanaugh: An attacker of women both legally and literally?

Image
There are constitutional reasons to put on hold any consideration of a nominee to the Supreme Court by President Trump, and plenty of other grounds for denying Brett Kavanaugh the lifetime appointment. When a letter about a sexual assault that Kavanaugh had allegedly committed in high school was released last week, I personally thought it might be a poor last-ditch effort to impede his appointment. We knew nothing about the anonymous allegation. Perhaps all there was to it was a clumsy encounter with a clueless high school boy. Why undermine the #MeToo movement with this cynical move? Surely, of all the reasons not to move forward with the appointment of Judge Kavanaugh, this was not the most robust. Today the person alleging the sexual assault came forward with a credible bone-chilling story. Dr. Christine Blasey Ford , a professor at Palo Alto University, “decided that if her story is going to be told, she wants to be the one to tell it. ” What she described was not a clumsy